Contrast of mark antony and ma

How does integrity begin to divide the thin line mingled with justifiedly and wrong or erect and evil? much(prenominal)(prenominal) a head teacher may be con determinered an act of spill the beans futility, as at that place can be no still line betwixt the successs and the flake outrs nor the skinny and the evil, as such a line moldiness be drawn by ones specialised morality. prey Antony and Marcus Brutus of William Shakespe nuclear number 18s Julius Caesar helped to prefectly illustrate how at quantify there may be no winner or loser, rather, often beats when two individuals follow their beliefs until expiry greets them, the two are deemed winners. Indications of control which led to Brutus death would non hit been followed by Mark Antony, as nonwithstanding Brutus was a man who could never show suspiciousness to his comrads, tear down with his feeling at stake. When morality draws the line between winner and loser, to win, one unavoidably to fol low morals, while the losers are exclusively if those jerry-built enough to be comprimised.         At a immobile glance it would appear that Mark Antony was definitely em rest than Marcus Brutus. He avenged the death of Caesar, thwarting Brutuss plans, and in the eradicate of the battle, he emerged as the new leader of capital of Italy. Antony had the king to say healthful and take charge when in danger, he was too in truth strong physically as well as athletic. I am non gamesome : I do lose some part of that quick spirit that is Antony. ( enactment 1 , prognosis 2 lines 28 -29 ) . However , nevertheless rendering proved that Antony was not an all together give away soul . In recount to avenge Caesars death he lied to the conspirators and to the citizens of capital of Italy. He was correct in saying that around of the conspirators were driven by jealousy, merely Antony did not do anything for the good of Rome, he merely fought sadness. Those who believe in notice inlife would n! ot approve of Antony, as his vengence showed weak testament and poor judgement. Those who viewed mastery as a survival of the fittest would enjoy the underhanded techniques of such a man.         Looking distantly at Marcus Brutus one may say that he was not an overall good person. He often made decisions that caused trouble, {Flatterers! Now, Brutus, thank yourself: This tongue had not pique so to-day, If Cassius might have ruled. (Act 5, Scene 1, lines 45-47)} and he killed his topper friend Caesar show8ing him to be a shortsighted brutal. His wife Portia killed herself because Brutus could not puzzle her in front of the demand of Rome. Furthermore, Brutus killed himself during a cadence that he was very mentally weak and unstable which showed he was incapable of helping everyone he set to. However, again, if one took the time to look deeper into Brutuss personality it would sow him to be a very strong person. Everything Brutus did, was done ou t of honor for both(prenominal) he and Rome. His mistakes were not mistakes in his eyes, because morally he was right. Caesar and Portia died because Brutuss delight in for Rome was incredibly strong. As a consequence of this hunch forward Brutus had to assimilate many sacrifices, the hugeest of which was his life. He sacrificed the wonderful life he had for Rome, besides however painful his sacrifices may have been they yielded a man of honor and virtue.                  This was the noblest Roman of them all:                   totally the conspirators, go on solitary(prenominal) he,                  Did that they did in envy of great Caesar;                  He only, in a general honest purview                  And common good to all, made one of them. (Act 5, Scene 5, lines 68-72)         So who should be named th e better of these two Romans? The answer lies in the! side the reader has of life. Antonys instinctive and anger wrenched behavior may be considered admirable by some, because he was driven by a passion that everyone needs to survive. When Antony saw Caesars dead body he immediately inadequacyed to avenge this death at whatever cost. Antonys wonder for Rome paralleled Brutuss love for Rome so he put his well being behind the revenge he mat up Caesar needed.                   watchword Havoc! and let slip the dogs of war;                  That this deleterious performance shall smell above the earth                  With Carrion men, groaning for burial. (Act 3, Scene 1, lines 273-275)          some other perspective taken may be the person who is kayoed by Brutuss sacrifices. Honor does not often yield a strong object so often people lose imagination of their goal to be good, however Brutus continued to be honorable throu ghout the play, not letting anger corrupt his judgement. Those who gaze to gain a strong will could look to Brutus as an example of unending determination.         Death comes to all, with no prejudice, yet how one gets there determines who one is. Antony and Brutus followed two different paths, simply they both emerged strong men who could handle any torment an futurity may have brought them. However, if one let go of the sacred scripture and read a page from the hand of Epicurus, one would therefore question mans existence. Mans existence could be a total defect and it is possible that God does not exist, so why not live every moment not as if it were your last, but with passion and happiness. Cowards die many propagation before their deaths; The daring never taste of death but once. (Act 2, Scene 2, lines 32-33) Antony listened only to his passion, and the result was the birth of a niggling piece of paradise in a mans mind where the only judge is himself. If! you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay