Criminal Justice Theories

CRIMINAL JUSTICE THEORIESAnalysis of Social conquer speculation and Labeling guess[Name][University][Professor][Subject][Date]IntroductionA superb philosopher once remarked that reality is by nature good condemnable , according to him is the result of ignorance or the lack of knowledge . When disgust is layted it is because of the limitation and imperfection of his present knowledge . though it may be true that no worldly concern is chastely corrupt by nature , Socrates explanation of the presence of wretched offence and evil in our society does not resolve to reception the question why people offend and commit iniquity . Why is it that tied(p) the highest ranking CEOs of multinational companies make out to detach money from their investors and stockholders ? It does not explain why even educated people beco me criminal offenders and violators of the law . This could hardly retrieve that there is more to crime than just the virtue or badness of the individualIt is because of this reason that Sociologists have turned to new(prenominal) causes or factors that may influence human look into committing crimes . This has resulted in several(prenominal) theories attempting to explain crime and deviance . These theories are Social declare Theory and Labeling Theory which will be discussed in this essaySocial throw TheorySocial Control Theory proceeds from the assumption that man is by nature broken-down and is capable of committing crimes . Instinct drives human sort to commit crime . Travis Hirschi , the proponent of Social Control Theory , asserts that despite man s inclinations to commit crime it can be controlled and his behavior can be regulated so as to make man conform to certain social rules or laws . He says that this could be done by strengthening man s social bonds with the people around him These social bond! s include adherence , commitment , involvement and belief .

The stronger these social bonds are , the more committed a person is to conventional activities and the greater his attachments to his parents and friends , the subtile likely it is that he will engage in flea-bitten behavior . Conversely , once this social bond is thinned then it is likely that individuals will engaged in tatterdemalion behavior (Reginald J . Alston , 1995 ,.3Thus , according to E .A . Ross the most in force(p) means for controlling and regulating behavior is not the practise of laws and the threats of punishment exactly the belief and value systems that helps man result with the rulesLabeling The oryLabeling Theory did not give much attention to crimes save to the labels that people attach to certain individuals or to certain acts . For eccentric all people have at one season violated rules . But not all persons are label as criminals . Only those people who are actually caught or whose deviant acts are disclosed to the public that are considered criminals . A person who is labeled as a criminal begins to theorise of himself as a criminal and begins to associate with other deviants olibanum reinforcing the stigma that society attaches to deviants . According to the results of a study...If you want to vex up a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay